Search Differences for Review Types
For all literature reviews, start out with interative searching (see image at right) -- review and refine results as you develop your topic and research question. 
For narrative literature reviews, balance relevance and comprehensiveness.
Evidence synthesis reviews, such as scoping and systematic reviews assume comprehensiveness, so make sure your search is broad and makes use of Boolean OR groups to avoid missing synonyms and closely related terms.
Database fields effect search strategy
Example (lower right): In PsycINFO, you can narrow to population group because that field is there for all records.
Most databases don't have a population group field in their records, so you might have to search for "human" or "animal study" in the Abstract, where the population group is most likely to be discussed.
- Combine controlled language with synonyms and phrase searching. Controlled language (subjects or descriptors in databases) takes time to form, so phrases researchers use don't always show up in subject searches. Boolean OR searching these terms creates large pools of information.
- Find words and phrases that are unique to your discipline.
- Words that take their context from other words, may need proximity or phrase searching. A word like "development" is a good example. It has many meanings that depend on the words around it -- "social development," early development stage," "Research and Development."
- Determine the importance of variables to your searching. Does the age groupof a population studied matter? Only need human studies and not animal studies? If so, check to see if you can use limiters. Limiters are most precise, but you can use field searching if needed.