Skip to Main Content
Main Library & McBay Science Library
Display of Opening hours
Hours
Main Library 7:30am – 2:00am
Circulation Desk 7:30am – 2:00am
Digital Humanities Lab 7:30am – 2:00am
Interlibrary Loan Office 8:00am – 5:00pm
Reference Desk 9:00am – 10:00pm
All Library Hours

AI Literacy

Listen to Learn - Podcasts about AI

When to use AI?

We strongly encourage students to carefully read UGA's Academic Honesty Policy for guidance on plagiarism and unauthorized assistance. At UGA, the default rule is that students are not permitted to use AI in their coursework unless it is explicitly authorized by the course instructor. Faculty have varying views on AI use, with some being more open to it than others, and in each individual course, the instructor may decide to what degree they will or will not allow AI use. Check the policies in each class syllabus and assignment instructions. If the AI policy is unclear, be sure to clarify the policy with your professor prior to using any AI tools in your coursework for that class.

Additionally, the Graduate School has their own policy, which prohibits the use of AI in theses and dissertations unless explicitly approved by the student's advisory committee. For non thesis/dissertation assignments, the instructor may choose to what degree using generative AI tools is permissible.

Here are some tip to make an informed choice for when to use AI for assignments. 

Review your syllabus and assignment. Does your instructor provide guidance on when or when not to use ChatGPT or other generative AI tools?The best time to talk with your instructor is before you begin your assignment to avoid needing to start over if generative AI isn't allowed.

Be specific in how you plan to use generative AI. Would you like to use ChatGPT to help brainstorm ideas or come up with a topic for your assignment? Are you using it to summarize or explain complex concepts? Or do you plan to use it for writing and editing? Be prepared that your instructor may approve some use cases but not others.

Have a plan for giving credit. APA Style, MLA Style, and Chicago Style all have guidelines for citing generative AI -- see our Citing AI section below. Your instructor may also ask for an appendix that includes the prompts that you provided to ChatGPT or the full transcript of your interaction.

What to do if you are falsely accused of cheating with AI - Dr. Lydon Walker, YouTube

"Ground Rules for Classes" in the Students' Guides to Navigating College in the Artificial Intelligence Era by Elon University & AAC&U

► See the Ethics and Impact section of this guide for more resources.

AI can be a great educational resource if sanctioned by your professor and in adherence with UGA's Academic Honesty Policy on plagiarism and unauthorized assistance. Here are some examples: 

Tutoring:Think of AI as a nonjudgmental tutor or study buddy. Check out this video on using chatGPT to create study flashcards. 

Outlining, brainstorming and getting creatively unstuck. AI's impact on creativity might be a mixed blessing. While it might help students come up with more diverse ideas, it can also cause over-reliance that stunts idea generation. Check out this article - How does generative artificial intelligence impact student creativity? (doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100072) 

Summarizing, translating, explaining information: AI can explain things in ways that are easy to understand for different audiences, difficulty levels, and contexts. It can even translate text to different languages, though it is not completely fluent in every language.

Narrowing your topic ideas for a research paper, and keywords for searching in library databases.

Discovering new research specific AI tools like:

  • Research Rabbit  - This tool calls itself the "Spotify for Papers." It helps users discover, organize, and explore scholarly papers related to their area of research. It also includes a Zotero integration to make citations quick and easy.
  • SciSpace - This tool is useful for discovering papers related to a specific research question. It's AI assistance streamlines the process of reviewing the existing literature on a topic. It can provide summaries, highlight gaps in current knowledge, and give users the option to "Chat" with a specific paper to ask clarifying questions about the research.
  • Rayyan - This tool aims to aid researchers doing systematic reviews or other types of review (Hint: Click here to figure out what kind of review is best for your research).  Rayyan can help by removing duplicate articles, streamlining the screening process, and creating custom filters.

Asking questions. Just be sure to evaluate and fact-check the responses. 

It can also help you write or debug computing code and even create visual media (Dall-E, Midjourney) or new music (Suno). 

► Read the Students' Guides to Navigating College in the Artificial Intelligence Era

Take into consideration the following when using ChatGPT or other AI tools:

Academic Integrity. Make sure to check your syllabus and ask your professor for guidance. We also encourage students to review UGA's Academic Honesty Policy before using AI tools for coursework. 

Inconsistency. Because generative AI is probabilistic (it predicts the most likely next word in a sentence), it is liable to be inconsistent and provide different answers for the same prompt. This makes it difficult to evaluate, and hinder its reproducibility, which is a crucial feature of scientific knowledge.

It is not always accurate or reliable. In fact, AI can hallucinate or fabricate information, presenting imaginary or nonsensical statements as facts. As librarians, we regularly come across fake references created by generative AI that simply do not exist. AI is not suited for information that would have dire consequences if it was incorrect (such as health, financial, legal advice, etc.)

Lack of transparency: It does not cite sources or otherwise indicate what in training data has led to the response

Citing AI: It is difficult to know how to cite generative AI, which is predictive based on its training data, and does not generate original ideas. It can also be difficult for your instructor to verify the citation since the same generative AI tool may not always answer the same question the same way every time.

Bias. Tools like ChatGPT are highly sensitive to slight wording changes in the prompts, which can skew responses. They are also limited by their training data, which may have inherent biases and over or under-represent certain voices, perspectives, and accounts of the world. They may have been trained on older and potentially outdated data and may not represent all topics or perspectives equally. For example, ChatGPT 3.5's training data goes up to 2022. ChatGPT4 and other alternatives have access to more recent information.

Further Reading:

Comparing Google Bard with OpenAI’s ChatGPT on political bias, facts, and morality - Brookings Institute  

These new tools let you see for yourself how biased AI image models are - MIT Technology Review 

Students' Guides to Navigating College in the Artificial Intelligence Era - Elon University & American Association of Colleges
and Universities

Here are some was to mitigate the risks and limitations of using AI to supplement your learning: 

Fact-check and evaluate 

Experiment with your prompts

Ground your answers with internet searches. Microsoft Copilot, ChatGPT Plus ($20/month), and Perplexity AI use internet search results to ground answers. While these internet sources might also contain misinformation or disinformation, they can link to the sources used to begin verification.

Use scholarly sources for evidence. Try using Multi-Search, our Subject Databases, or Google Scholar. You can also try other AI tools to find additional sources. Tools like Scite, Elicit, and Consensus include generative AI features, like natural language queries, summarizing, outlining, etc. Some even use semantic searching based on Semantic Scholar or OpenAlex. These are not 100% free, as most have usage limits.

Academic Integrity. Check your syllabus, talk with your professor, and carefully review UGA's Academic Honesty Policy for guidance on plagiarism and unauthorized assistance. 

► Explore the Tool Comparison and Fact Checking AI sections of this guide for additional strategies. 

OpenAI collects user data to improve ChatGPT (OpenAI Policy FAQ). This data could be potentially shared with third-parties. If your instructor asks you to use ChatGPT for an activity or assignment, please let them know you'd prefer to opt-out. You can also ask for an alternate assignment.

Videos about AI

Citing AI

Before you reference AI, make sure it is ethical for you to use GenAI output (see the section of this guide on Is it Cheating to Use AI?) 

  • Fact-check any content you plan to use to ensure accuracy and reliability. Check out the Fact Checking section of this guide for more tips.
  • Cite or acknowledge your use properly.
  • Check with your instructor or publisher on how to document or cite your use of generative AI.

APA Style: How to cite ChatGPT

APA Style instructions on how to cite ChatGPT and other generative AI (last update on February 23, 2024).

Chicago Style: Citation, Documentation of Sources

Chicago Style recommendations on citing generative AI (published March 17, 2023).

MLA Style: How do I cite generative AI in MLA style?

Instructions on how to cite generative AI using the MLA format (published March 13, 2023).

AMA Style

AMA does not recommend citing generative AI as an author as it does not "qualify for authorship" (doi:10.1001/jama.2023.1344). Instead, they advise authors to describe their use of large language models (LLMs) and chatbots in the text. 

Bluebook Style

Bluebook has not issued any rules or recommendations for citing generative AI. Here is a "best guess" guide from the University of Washington Law School Library.